Philosophy In the writings of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics' and the E book X, he discusses the idea of contemplative life and exactly how enjoyment can be founded through virtue. In this particular paper, I'll argue the reason why Aristotle has provided in establishing his theory a contemplative life is the greatest life to have, and provide reasons as to the reasons I really believe his quarrels are convincing enough to be looked at valid. To establish an understanding of Aristotle's ideas about contemplative life, we should first identify the relations he makes between pleasure and virtue.
He gives evidential reasoning which will be discussed to show that he does not undermine his Virtue Ethics by making this claim. Because Aristotle is basing his argument on virtue ethics, he is not trying to derive a rule but, deriving a good person.
An overall good human should possess character-traits to be a Aristotle contemplative life essay good person. Aristotle then, gives his Function Argument.
When we know what that function is, then and only then can we aim to function at our best. When we function at our best, we can reach our final end, and that final end is happiness. As happiness is something final and self-sufficient, and is the end of action Aristotle, pg This argument concludes that if we are to function well, we must first know what our primary function is.
He claims that this commonality in humans resides in reason and rationality. However, he further explains that it is much more than that. Aristotle more clearly defines this as such: These are both parts of the rational soul. Nutritive, associated with growth, and Appetitive, associated with desires are part of the irrational soul.
The deliberative part of the soul controls the irrational part mainly the appetitive part and Aristotle claims that because the contemplative part of the soul does not contain any portion of the irrational soul, and thus is the truest from of happiness.
He later gives two kinds of virtues: The intellectual virtues are related to the rational part of the soul.
These, again, consist of philosophical wisdom and practical wisdom. Intellectual requires experience and time to develop whereas moral virtues are formed by habit. Aristotle sums up his account of virtues by stating that in order to do virtuous acts we must do them until they become habit moral virtueshowever, we must have the intellect and knowledge to know how to choose the virtuous action that is correct for the situation practical wisdom.
It must be said that practical wisdom is not deliberation; however, practical wisdom is the virtue of deliberation, if done well. We deliberate about things that are in our power and can be done and we also deliberate on a means to an end and not the end in itself. The ends are based on a rational wish.
It is about inquiry and if we come on impossibility, we give up on our search Aristotle, pg The activity of deliberation is to form a habit of making good choices and habitually making good choices results in a practice of virtuousness.
Moreover, one would be considered making good choices when these choices are not extremes of virtues. This leads the discussion into the relationship between contemplation and practical wisdom. Aristotle refers to Intellectual virtues and contemplation, as a scientific knowledge, combined with intuitive reason of the things that are highest by nature.
Practical wisdom on the other hand is concerned with things human and things about which it is possible to deliberate Aristotle, pg He later argues that man must possess practical wisdom and it is impossible to be practically wise without being good and a good man is one who is happy. However, he proclaims that philosophical wisdom is superior to practical wisdom even though practical wisdom is a capacity and a disposition to act upon what is good for human beings.
He states his case by explaining that philosophical wisdom is the truth or falsity of unknowns. It is the foresight of knowledge and experience to be able to deliberate upon correctly.
Because philosophical wisdom rationalizes with things that are the highest by nature, one can suggest that this would allow for the human being to reach and obtain the highest level of happiness. Aristotle believes that if the human can achieve the best of the intellectual state i.The Conclusion of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics essay writing service, custom The Conclusion of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics papers, term papers, free The Conclusion of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics samples, research papers, help for Aristotle, contemplative life implies the experience of pleasure which is far more intense than.
Aristotle attempts to cover this can be see is his example of two separate lives; one is the active, political human being, whilst the other is the ‘contemplative life’. He argues that the active, political life is far superior to the former. Now, after giving a background of Aristotle’s theory of Virtue Ethics, the argument to give for this view, the relationship between contemplation and practical wisdom, it can be concluded that Aristotle does not undermine his Virtue Ethics by claiming that the moral life is a secondary happiness to contemplation.
Secondly, to further give reasoning as to why contemplation is superior over deliberation, a discussion of the relationship between philosophical wisdom and practical wisdom will be mentioned. In conclusion, Aristotle’s argument claims that moral life is a secondary happiness to contemplation.
Aristotle: The Life of Contemplation is the Best Life. Essay by ssd, University, Bachelor's, B+ honor, pleasurable life: appetitive and contemplative life: wisdom. The life of contemplation is seen as the best life by Aristotle; this paper will examine his reasons for believing that it is the best, through his convincing arguments.
/5(3). Of all the aristotle contemplative life essay classical theories considered here, his is the giver essay ideas the farthest from an.
Essay today's readers tomorrow's leader 1. He sanskrit essay on kalpana chawla is sometimes called the Stagirite.