March 5, by Liz Comments For an IELTS agree disagree essay you can either agree with the statement, disagree with the statement or give your opinion which contains a balanced approach to the issues in the statement. Another name for an agree disagree essay is an opinion essay or argumentative essay. Download a PDF copy of the model essay below: Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the school curriculum.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook. Wikipedia articles should not read like: While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places and things, an article should not read like a "how-to" style owner's manualcookbookadvice column legalmedical or otherwise or suggestion box.
This includes tutorials, instruction manuals, game guides, and recipes.
Describing to the reader how people or things use or do something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the imperative mood about how to use or do something is not.
An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvrebut not Features of an opinion essay telephone number or street address of the "best" restaurants, nor the current price of a French: Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like.
Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. While travel guides for a city will often mention distant attractions, a Wikipedia article for a city should only list those that are actually in the city.
If you do wish to help write a travel guide, your contributions would be welcome at our sister project, Wikivoyage. An article about a video game should briefly summarize the story and the main actions the player performs in the game; however, avoid lists of gameplay weapons, items, or concepts, unless these are notable as discussed in secondary sources in their own right in gaming context such as the BFG from the Doom series.
Walk-throughs or detailed coverage of specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are also considered inappropriate. A concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry.
Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should also describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance, which can be kept significantly more up-to-date than most reference sources, since editors can incorporate new developments and facts as they are made known.
See the Current events portal for examples. Wikipedia articles should not list frequently asked questions FAQs. Instead, format the information as neutral prose within the appropriate article s.
Textbooks and annotated texts. Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not a textbook. The purpose of Wikipedia is to present facts, not to teach subject matter. It is not appropriate to create or edit articles that read as textbooks, with leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples.
These belong on our sister projects, such as WikibooksWikisourceand Wikiversity. Some kinds of examples, specifically those intended to inform rather than to instruct, may be appropriate for inclusion in a Wikipedia article.
A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well-versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the lead and sometimes the initial sections of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic.
While wikilinks should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not or cannot follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.
Texts should be written for everyday readers, not just for academics. Article titles should reflect common usagenot academic terminology, whenever possible. Many topics are based on the relationship of factor X to factor Y, resulting in one or more full articles. For example, this could refer to situation X in location Y, or version X of item Y.
This is perfectly acceptable when the two variables put together represent some culturally significant phenomenon or some otherwise notable interest. Often, separate articles are needed for a subject within a range of different countries, due to substantial differences across international borders; articles such as " Slate industry in Wales " and " Island fox " are fitting examples.
Writing about " Oak trees in North Carolina " or " Blue trucks ", however, would likely constitute a POV fork or original researchand would certainly not result in an encyclopedic article. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but a digital encyclopedia caninariojana.com than verifiability and the other points presented on this page, there is no practical limit to the number of topics Wikipedia can cover or the total amount of content.
A comprehensive, coeducational Catholic High school Diocese of Wollongong - Albion Park Act Justly, love tenderly and walk humbly with your God Micah A new rock music and pop culture website.
Editorial independent music website offering news, reviews, features, interviews, videos and pictures. For an IELTS agree disagree essay you can either agree with the statement, disagree with the statement or give your opinion which contains a balanced approach to the issues in the statement.
Write an essay in which you explain how Paul Bogard builds an argument to persuade his audience that natural darkness should be preserved. In your essay, analyze how Bogard uses one or more of the features in the directions that precede the passage (or features of your own choice) to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument.
the question for the Senate is this: Is the new standard for those in public life that accusations of misconduct with no corroboration are enough to destroy someone's reputation and career?