Share via Email This article is over 2 years old A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that a macaque monkey who took now-famous selfie photographs cannot be declared the copyright owner of the photos.
A macaque monkey who took now-famous selfie photographs should be declared the copyright owner of the photos, rather than the nature photographer who positioned the camera, animal-rights activists contend in a novel lawsuit filed Tuesday. It seeks a court order allowing PETA to administer all proceeds from the photos for the benefit of the monkey, which it identified as 6-year-old Naruto, and other crested macaques living in a reserve on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi.
The photos were taken during a trip to Sulawesi by British nature photographer David Slater. Advertisement However, the photos have been widely distributed elsewhere by outlets, including Wikipedia, which contend that no one owns the copyright to the images because they were taken by an animal, not a person.
Get Ground Game in your inbox: Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell. Sign Up Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here Last year, the US Copyright Office issued an updated compendium of its policies, including a section stipulating that it would register copyrights only for works produced by human beings.
It specified that works produced by animals, whether a photo taken by a monkey or a mural painted by an elephant, would not qualify.
It's finally over. After years of legal back-and-forth, PETA and photographer David Slater have settled their lawsuit over the famous (and infamous) monkey selfie. A selfie taken by a macaque monkey on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi with a camera that was positioned by British nature photographer David Slater in On July 4, , photographer David Slater and Naruto, a Celebes crested macaque, leapt into the public consciousness. It was on that day that several publications in the UK featured the story of Naruto and the now-famous “monkey selfie” photo.
But he also has defended his right to make money from the photos. A federal judge dismissed the suit, saying the 13th Amendment applied only to humans. The selfies were introduced as exhibits in the suit. Laurence Tribe, a Harvard Law School professor who supports animal rights, expressed misgivings about the litigation.It looks like you've lost connection to our server.
Please check your internet connection or reload this page.
The Act of Plagiarism in the Selfie Photograph of David Slater with the Famous Monkey, Naruto ( words, 4 pages) Monkeys are said to be the closest organism to a human being. Although they do not have the capability to think as well as humans, they do mimic humans actions.
Naruto, a now-famous monkey known for taking a “selfie” that prompted an unprecedented copyright lawsuit, has another chance at claiming ownership over his image as PETA has filed an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The images in question were taken in by. District court denies prediscovery motion for partial summary judgment brought by Kendrick Lamar, SZA and others seeking to bar plaintiff whose paintings were allegedly infringed in music video for song “All the Stars” from recovering profits generated by song and purported reputational damages.
The owner of the camera, photographer David J.
Slater, has been selling copies of the pictures for profit. He and his company, Wildlife Personalities, both claim copyright ownership of the photos, even though Slater admits that Naruto took the photos himself in The monkey in the famous “selfie” photo does not have enlarged canine teeth compared to juvenile monkeys.
Photographer David Slater told us in an email, “All you need to know is PETA have no proof they are talking about the same monkey.